drudge blog logo

Covering the Drudge Report, Matt Drudge, New Media, News...

-->

Wednesday, October 31, 2007


My Last Post: Rego is Gone, But Matt Drudge Lives On

Several interesting – and pressing – things are going down right now, which I won’t go into, but this will be my last contributing post on this blog.  

I want to thank all readers who’ve contributed insight, feedback, even story links related to Matt Drudge and media-related topics.  Most of all, I want to thank Lance for inviting me to post here on his site. For my part, it started as a lark and then snowballed into a creative exercise while I was shaping my novel. Sometimes I tried to offer a serious analysis based on my research. Sometimes I indulged in good old-fashioned camp. But it’s always been stimulating, and the conversation continues. 

When things die down, my plans are to regroup with blogs I’ve been neglecting.  For any questions regarding Drudge, or to follow my postings on media-related topics, check out http://regopark.wordpress.com.  If you’re following DrudgeBlog via RSS feed, consider hooking up with the RegoPark blog under RSS as well.  

To follow progress on my book and for literature-related topics, there’s also http://smidbeach.wordpress.com

And if you’re into YouTube, view my book trailers at www.youtube.com/smidbeach under “Names Have Been Changed”.

Again, I may be too slammed to post much for the coming month, but I will be reachable. 

Meanwhile, check out Lance’s postings here and at www.drudgeforum.com.  Lance is working hard on an even bigger, better forum than ever that has something for everyone.

Thanks for a great almost-three years.  It’s been surreal.

  by RegoPark - 1:21 am        Comments (4) »


Friday, October 26, 2007


Matt Drudge Turns 41!

It’s a busy month in Regoland, so I have yet to join in the fray as some media character resembling Matt Drudge runs amok and morphs far out of his creator’s control. I’ll also won’t be online tomorrow when Matt turns 41 flavors. But to commemorate the fact that he’s 40 and holding (he mentioned on the radio this summer that he had “just turned 40″…oh, okay) check out a fun 411 from the past:

Quiz:What Do You Really Know About Drudge, Anyway?



Monday, October 22, 2007


Same Game, Same Playground, Different Players

This in the New York Times this morning. Same points, same sound bites, same year, different publication.

  by RegoPark - 6:42 pm        Comments (1) »


Thursday, October 11, 2007


Teacher’s Pedant

Correction: My press archives show that Drudge has claimed to work up to 15 hours a day (not 14, as I’ve repeated in September). I want to say 16, because there was one spring 2005 radio show where he mentioned his man hours but I was not taking notes. Again, the figures fluctuate from year to year, from interview to interview.

  by RegoPark - 11:42 am        Comments (0) »


Monday, October 1, 2007


Sundays Will Never Be the Same: A Look Back at Drudge Radio

Matt Drudge has left the airwaves. At least for the regularly scheduled Sunday night slot. If you’ve liked Drudge’s radio show, the swan song was a good one. He chose to have no guests but opened the lines for questions about anything, him included, and spent a generous amount of time explaining the logistics of the show and other assorted whatnot. While it was the typical replayed clips, he didn’t ramble and he kept things positive.

The first Sunday night I listened to Matt Drudge in 2004, I fell asleep. I’m not into talk radio, particularly not conservative talk radio, so this is it for me and rancid ear candy. I can’t even evaluate Drudge Report Radio as a typical consumer, because I’ve multitasked Drudge with either a notebook or a keyboard. During that first year, those last three hours of Sunday were a niche of very limited time to focus on the novel manuscript that his presence in the news helped inspire.  I thought at the time that I’d done all the research my project really needed, but was still curious about how this personality, which came alive in print via raw interviews and news stories, translated onto radio. The short answer is that I tuned in out of curiosity to see what I’d get out of it.

Drudge is a conservative-slash-libertarian-slash populist who straddles the edge of party lines, who forced me out of my political comfort zone and nudged me toward trains of thought I’d never other wise hop onto.  Three years later, my values and tastes haven’t changed. I’m still concerned that humans do have an effect on global warming. I’m still not impressed with his idol Pat Buchanan, nor do I read any occult implications into Harry Potter. 

Something about him was entertaining – both intentionally and unintentionally – in a way that most radio ga-ga isn’t. He made Dick Morris and Ann Coulter digestible (in tablet-sized sound bites) and Nikki Finke palatable. A chat with Camille Paglia made her as fabulous as ever.

Given a mike and a three-hour daypart, Drudge is often a good servant but a bad master. He can be annoying, inane, kneejerk, shortsighted, repetitive, disrespectful, and oblivious. But, dang it, dude has verve. When he’s good, he’s very, very good. When he’s bad, he’s still worth the time.

Matt well earned his nickname of “Dead Air Drudge” when I first began listening (not so much recently). When I hear the same clips for the fifth time, I can totally envision him as a babbling grandpa rehashing the same tired story ad infinitum. He must have known as he called Walter Cronkite “old goat,” that he wasn’t immune to the same disease. Nor was he above criticizing an invited guest post-interview with whom he disagreed. But what I did regret about Drudge was the occasional lack of sensitivity and humility toward callers who deserved – well, at least a little better.

CALLER: Mr. Drudge, it’s the Christmas season, and I’ll give you a chance to take back the terrible things you said about retarded people….(explains a previous show in which Matt said that Spider Man 2 was a movie “for the retarded”.) I raised a 19-year-old retarded son, and you did not.

DRUDGE (with an edge of irritation): Well, then, what should I say, sir?  (Quickly, as the station break sounds go off) Spider Man is a movie for all races, creeds and colors…

But usually he could hold his own at nobody else’s expense:

CALLER WITH SUPPRESSED VOICE: What is the percentage of neocons who are Jewish?

DRUDGE (who’s Jewish): I think I saw you in the Borat movie this weekend. (Plays a clip of Sacha Baron Cohen’s “Throw the Jew Down the Well”). This one’s for you, Mel.

Drudge’s show was the most fun when he was caught off-guard.  Women with soft voices seemed to gelatinize his steel armor.

FEMALE CALLER (after a few sentences of gushing) You should win the Nobel Peace Prize! Are you married?

DRUDGE(softening, a little nervous): Thank you…you’re embarrassing me a little.

FEMALE CALLER (after another sentence of gushing) Are you married?

DRUDGE: Um, no.

It’s never been 100% clear to me how much of the on-air persona was really Matt.  He’s gone off on the occasional tirade – most notably, a William Buffett quote in which his voice morphed into a peculiar snarl – when I wondered if he might be slightly losing it. Or maybe it’s like a high school friend told the Washington City Paper – he has a knack for coming off the wrong way. When he went off on the Mark Foley jag about teenage “beasts”, I knew how it would come off. But even as I poked holes in his fallacious reasoning, I knew where he was coming from, and I developed a respect for him.

And then, the one-liners:

“I’m in that wonderful Drudge cynical mood.”

“News is where you find it.  Don’t you agree, you Internet pioneer, you?”

“I’m a sucker for a cheap cry.”

 “I find comfort in historical context – that we’ve been through this before.” 

 “To me, it’s comforting for someone to wear their politics on their sleeve…”

Re: suggestion of doing another TV show: “I am so not on the market right now. I’m allergic to the pancake makeup.”

On Dan Rather: “I think he’s a patriot, I really do.” 

On Washington: “The real stinky fishbowl.”

(Clapping his hands underneath the mike, reminding me of a monkey playing cymbals) “Oh, and I’m so proud of these kids getting all cleaned up.”

Drudge Radio, in many ways, was an extension of the website, but it was also an outlet for an inherently creative person to flesh out ideas, tones, and attitudes that translated differently on the page. What got him fired up on-air wasn’t necessarily apparent on the site, and vice versa. It was compelling on a more intellectual plane. Perhaps like observing wildlife in their natural habitat: either you appreciate what you observed or you didn’t. Either you had the patience to sit still and listen, or you didn’t. If you’re staking out the scene with a cocked gun and listening only for what you want, you’ll only come away with what you want: a dead shell of something vibrant.

What I’ll definitely miss is that direct communication that translates only through an autonomous radio show. News consumers see and hear from Drudge what they want to see and hear. Conservatives want someone to affirm their values, liberals want confirmation that he’s a buffoon or a slimeball. But if you lowered your expectations, and your guard, and listened without prejudice, something interesting happened.

On a more personal level, Matt Drudge has been the most fascinating research project I’ve taken on. The end of the show means that there really is nothing left to glean, at least insofar as my book goes. It’s the end of a three-year routine, of turning over every possible stone, keeping my eyes and ears alert for every conceivable source of useful information. For three and a half years, if it wasn’t a Jewish holiday and I was in the United States, Drudge was my plans on Sunday night…whether I was in the mood or not.

My archives are complete. The research is done. All there is now to do is move forward with the finished manuscript. For Drudge and for me, it’s the end of an era.

Damn, that was fun. 

As Spanky and Our Gang sang, “Sundays will never be the same.”

RegoPark is a freelance writer with a background in marketing communications. She has recently completed a novel on the relationship between PR and new media. She can be reached at http://regopark.wordpress.com.

  by RegoPark - 2:10 am        Comments (5) »



I Told You So!

Sorry, guys, I just had to say it.  Drudge’s final broadcast pretty much confirmed all the things I talked about this month.

He actually READ a question I flashed him a minute later and answered it at 9:35. It’s just one of those surreal moments. I’m sitting here laughing my ass off.

All right. I got it out of my system. Back to adulthood…

  by RegoPark - 12:48 am        Comments (0) »


Saturday, September 29, 2007


Countdown to Radio Silence: It’s Drudge (For the Last Time) on Sunday Night

In the month since the news first leaked about Matt Drudge’s decision to end his popular radio broadcast, the silence on both the Drudge Report and the show itself is deafening. No direct comment has been offered to the press, excluding a public comment box posting from an indeterminate source. We’re down to the wires, kids, and there’s no telling what old Mattness is going to pull over the airwaves at 10 Eastern. Anything…I repeat, anything…is possible.

He could break his silence up front and announce/admit that this will be the last broadcast. Or, he could wait till the final hour, after the final station break..or (and I will not put it past him) he might actually go the entire three hours without even making a peep goodbye, leaving some listeners to find out after the fact.

He could break some unexpected news about himself…retirement, career move, engagement, parenthood, health issue, lawsuit.  Or, he may offer no comment on his decision to hang it up. (Or, he’ll restrict it to one “I Know When to Retire, Unlike Rather and Cronkite” monologue.)

He could get mushy. (One of his favorite quotes is “I’m a sucker for a cheap cry” – a sentiment he’s test-driven in at least one public 1998 speech and “teared up” when he hit the “Enter” key on the Monica Lewinsky post. Or, he could be a rock and an island and steel himself till the end.

He could be generous with callers…or he could go wait till the final half of the show to take them, if at all. Maybe tell them how boring or stupid he really thinks they are.

He could focus on making the best show possible…or he could go out with a ramble and a whimper. Maybe throw in an FCC violation or two.

He could turn the swan song into a retrospective…or he could be strictly business as usual and produce the exact same kind of show he’s always done.

He could have something up his sleeve…or he could be too damned tired to care.

Nothing he can say or do tomorrow night can possibly shock me. Nothing he can say can be expected, either. Except this: Drudge is going to do what Drudge is going to do. And that involves enjoying himself enjoying news.

RegoPark is a freelance writer with a background in marketing communications who has recently completed a media novel. She can be reached at http://regopark.wordpress.com.
 

  by RegoPark - 11:52 pm        Comments (0) »


Monday, September 24, 2007


The Unsexy Truth About Matt Drudge’s Radio Departure

Despite the fun some people have had speculating about Matt Drudge’s retirement from radio, I can think of (and have shared) enough compelling-but-boring reasons why ten years might be a mighty good time to call it a life. At the time I announced the possibility on this space this month, it was still unclear whether Drudge was only leaving the Premiere Radio syndicate or whether he was leaving the industry altogether.  I’m not especially wild about sowing the seeds of gossip, especially when my words will be taken out of context by journalists and readers with less than stellar reading comprehension (which, indeed, they were.) For what it’s worth, let me throw this out before moving along:

If the news of a radio host’s departure is newsworthy enough to report and speculate about, should a journalist:

(a) Seek further information from the syndicate (length of contract, termination clause, date of tendered resignation)

(b) Interview sources in the radio industry for pertinent industry information, radio contracts or other commentary that might offer legitimate clues,

(c) Scour available information on the radio host (other obligations, the tone and nature of recent broadcasts, any significant changes in work, life or job performance)

(d) Scour the grapevine?

Obviously, blogs and mainstream gossip columns aren’t written like term papers. They aren’t written for posterity or the historical record.

You might guess that I’m a real backseat driver when it comes to journalism, and a consummate legalist at that. I don’t go for hooded tribunals or kangaroo court, and if hearsay doesn’t have a place in the U.S. justice system, it won’t occupy one in my mind. To me, anonymous sources mean jack shit. I am not interested in anyone’s imaginary friends. Creative writing has its place…and is no more legitimate a presence in a news story than it would be in a legal brief or scientific abstract.  I also have yet to be sold on the philosophy that “gossip is the glue that holds society together and shows that we all care about one another.” 

But I do believe that the media is a court of sorts, and everyone is theoretically entitled to due process. That Matt Drudge is a less than reliable news source himself doesn’t mean that there shouldn’t be fair and accurate reporting about him as well.

I can say this about anyone or any news subject. Drudge just happens to be one of my research subjects. That’s all.

While I could be wrong, I have doubts that the “Matt Drudge” commenter in Jeff Bercovici’s Portfolio column is the real McCoy. The documented e-mails and online interviews show Matt’s type in all-caps with shoddy spelling and punctuation.  It’s more the exception than the rule for reporters never to hear from Drudge, who’s received daily e-mails in the thousands since the late 90s. One Miami New Times reporter, who was granted a 2001 interview, waited weeks for a response. 

Why would Matt Drudge, who has not even acknowledged he is leaving radio (let alone commenting on the reasons), promptly post a response in a public comment box?  It’s withing the realm of possibility but outside the realm of probability. 

The Top Ten Unsexy Likelihoods Why Drudge is Leaving Radio

1. He’s done it ten years and has always expressed disdain for old fogeys like Walter Cronkite who don’t know when to hang it up.

2. He works 10-14 hours a day even without the show.

3. He travels 30% of the time and has to either broadcast from a studio in a major city, secure appropriate equipment, or arrange for a substitute every Sunday night.

4. Either Drudge or his syndicate wants to make changes in the contract that aren’t amenable to the other…and it seems like a good time for an amicable departure.

5. As he told Miami New Times: “The callers are boring.”

6. He may be serious about his radio rantings that he’ll leave the country if a tax-and-spend Democrat enters the White House.

7. His social or personal life is changing and something has to go.

8. He has to reduce his stress, even if the issue isn’t being forced right now.

9.  Lowering his profile would be kinda-sorta nice, even if he isn’t ready for an icehouse in Minnesota.

10. He’s focusing on what he really has a passion for, doing it as long as he can.

 

RegoPark is a freelance writer with a background in marketing communications. She has recently completed a novel on the relationship between PR and new media. She can be reached at http://regopark.wordpress.com.

 

  by RegoPark - 10:47 pm        Comments (10) »


Wednesday, September 12, 2007


Is Matt Drudge silent because he’s being savvy, or is he silent because he’s NOT being savvy?

My observation of Matt Drudge thus far is that he knows publicity but not public relations.  The news of him leaving the radio show has been around for a week, perhaps despite a news embargo (it leaked when his replacement on a local outlet expedited a press release). The news has now been picked up on Page Six and still no acknowledgment on the Drudge Report nor last Sunday’s radio show.

If he wanted to deflect further attention from the media — which he’s been eluding for awhile now — his best course of action would have been to post an announcement on the site as soon as the news leaked (if not before) and acknowledge it on last week’s radio show to diffuse the time bomb. Keeping an open line of communication with publics doesn’t necessarily mean baring one’s soul, but it can save lots of headaches. Unfortunately this is probably the last way to get the results he really wants…which, from all he’s alluded, is to be left alone to work on his site.

So the reason I’m following this with fascination is probably different from most of you. Why he’s leaving the radio show isn’t nearly as interesting as how he’s choosing to communicate the fact…the strategy or non-strategy he’s working right now. What raises my whiskers is not a public figure’s personal life, but how he or she chooses to interact with the media. One thing I’ll miss about the radio show is the raw, unedited monologue. As a PR person, I understand the intrinsic value of a sound bite. Yet the news consumer in me feels that quantity IS quality.

In any case, I can’t say it’s not getting interesting…Meanwhile, his rant last Sunday pretty much reflects what I’ve understood before (but expressed more humorously…check out the 10:00 segment on Drudge Radio Archives for the September 9th show)…

Enough already! Oh! And that’s just a snippet. I mean, that’s just a snippet. (Laughing) What is…Okay, one guy, sitting in front of a computer, with a WiFi connection. And all of this? Come on, give me a break. Snap out of it, guys!  I mean, obviously there’s not enough news to report, so…you know, I guess they’re reporting on me. Obviously you know, a, a country of 300 million people is not fascinating enough and they’re, they’re, you know concentrating on little old me, sitting here with this mouse and this keyboard and this monitor…Come on! Not all that!  The mania! The mania. Now that was from the, uh, Fox News media show. So I — are they trying to get me back on television, is that was it is, are they trying to seduce me, “The most powerful man in the world!” “The most powerful man in journalism, Matt Drudge!” (Chuckles) Come on! All right, yeah, the website’s interesting, I agree; I give it my all, all right! Cool! Fun! Welcome, jump in! But all of this? I mean, this is just – this is a little – this is a little much, guys!

(Replaying clip) “…terms that is what?”“Convergence of gossip and trivia with politics…”

 Aw, give me a break. And they’re still using that one, so I’ve gone from gossipmonger to blogger to linker to freak to whatever – what’s the new one? And 60 Minutes, I’m telling you, you come around here, I’ve got mace. I’m getting these threats from 60 Minutes, “We’re doing it with or without you.” Mace! Mace! Mike Wallace, I’ve got magnets for your heart pacer. Oh, yeah!  If-if this is the way they’re going to do it in ’08…It’s one guy with a computer and a website, it’s all this is, they got to snap out of their illusions here. Don’t have these corporate newsrooms with hundreds of people and hundreds of lawyers and hundreds of printing presses and hundreds of satellites and all- all these people. It’s not what this is. I-in fact, my success kind of shows how they’ve lost their way. They should be interesting! They – they should be dazzling! I-i-it should be a lot more provocative. It’s – it’s their failure that is leading to my – my success. I think that’s what it is.  Uh – beyond my ability to move fast and to – you know, get headlines you’re not seeing yet. All right, fine. But all-all of this drama?

(Replaying clip) “…about the most powerful journalist in America. His website is the seventh most popular website in America, beating out the sites of the New York Times, the Washington Post and Fox News Channel. NBC’s Brian Williams says his site is America’s bulletin board and much more…”

“Who is just about the most powerful journalist in America? Matt Drudge.”

(Canned laughter)

(Laughing) Okay…All right, I’ll go back to Fox News, what the heck. That worked; that’s all they needed to do. Get me Roger Ailes; I’ll go back on. I don’t know what they’re up to, but all right, I guess I should take the flattery, yes, all right, thank you, I’m bowing. I’m bowing to Rupert Murdoch’s satellite dish! Thank you! Thank you, emperor. What is – what is the point of all that? All right, I guess they think that’s news. I guess by making me the most powerful man in journalism they think they’re doing news here. I quite don’t get it. I-I quite don’t get what they’re up to there. Maybe they’re not up to anything; maybe they’re just trying to fill, uh, a slow news period. But I don’t know. The problem is that it’s not a slow news period…”
 

One of those vignettes I’ll miss. Developing…

RegoPark is a freelance writer with a background in marketing communications who has recently completed a media novel. She can be reached at http://regopark.wordpress.com.

  by RegoPark - 8:55 am        Comments (10) »


Friday, September 7, 2007


Quick Update

It’s my assumption at this point that unless something is seriously screwy with news reporting at the Cincinnati Enquirer (no relation to the other E), Drudge will formally announce his “radio retirement” at the Sunday night show with one of his famous lectures on media figures like Dan Rather and Walter Cronkite who don’t know when to ride off into the sunset. The radio listings are back up on the site, but they’re not updated and the show is on different stations in at least one market.  (On weeks he wasn’t broadcasting, he refrained from posting a Sunday headline, but I’ve never spotted or traced an outright removal of the station listing.)

Lots of red letter headlines on the site itself, but no reference to the reports on the end of the radio show.

In any case, the next four weeks should be mighty interesting. If you’re unable to listen live, you can also catch the show the next day at www.drudgeradioarchives.com

I’m going to dig into my research archives for my favorite quotes and moments on the radio show. You are invited to post your most memorable moments on the radio show — funny, favorite, least favorite, what have you…bumper music, guests, and all… in the comment box below for a post on this subject.

 

  by RegoPark - 11:40 am        Comments (7) »


Tuesday, September 4, 2007


Drudge May or May Not Quit Radio After Last Week of September

 UPDATE: If you’re following this from another link, you’ll notice that this is obviously old news which I reported with all available information at the time, which has since been updated and will continue to be updated when I have more to go on than anonymous “friends”. I think it’s quite clear that I acted in good faith to separate fact from speculation.

For first-time visitors: THIS IS NOT A FAN SITE.  I just happen to have spent roughly three years researching Matt Drudge’s press for a novel, distinguishing his direct quotes from journalistic creative license.  This includes all publicly accessible interviews, his radio show since 2004, among other sources.  It’s my philosophy that the clearest picture of an individual emerges from how he or she chooses to dialogue with the press, and what is volunteered.  Drudge raises many epistemological questions about which I write: What can we really know about the news we consume, and what is the real divide between citizen journalists and mainstream media?

I do not dub him the most powerful journalist in America, and I disagree with him on most  issues. But I’ve found the real person much more interesting than the media golem that has come to life and run out of control.

Original posting:

***

 Don’t take my word for it. Keep monitoring the news and patronizing your local stations until it’s clear one way or another.  I’ll make a consicentious effort to set the record straight if this is incorrect.

I don’t report like Matt Drudge, so I do not want to be the one to break news that may be disproven later. But from Google News Alerts have sprung reports that Matt Drudge has ended his contract with Premiere Radio Networks after September 30, and an Ohio market has already announced his slot replacement on its website.  Caveat: It is not known whether he is simply changing syndicates or whether he is giving up radio altogether.  

First facts, then educated speculation:

Matt Drudge has said (specifically in 2005 on Washington Journal) that he travels 30% of the time. At least once, he spent three weeks in London, working throughout the day and going out later.

He has been broadcasting his radio show from home. He has also broadcast from London, L.A., Las Vegas, and New York.  I know he was absent once when he was in Vienna. In any case, his contract obligates him to be accessible each Sunday night. 

At the most, he has perhaps 26 hours a week of help (as of 2005).  He works 10 to 14 hours a day on the site.

A review of Drudge Report Archives shows that the permanent link to his radio stations disappeared sometime between 3:30ish and 8 a.m. on August 26, hours after he was most recently on air. (He had a sub this past Sunday.)  However, keep in mind that switching parent syndicates would still necessitate removing that link.

His absences, while not frequent, are growing closer together.

He has told the press that he likes keeping his life simple.

The August 25 show itself was business as usual. The only thing unusual I noted was that he referred to Hillary as a “squirrelly bitch” (is that permitted by the FCC?)  But there was no acknowledgment of the New York article that revealed lots of personal information sure to upset him (specific home address and island location, info on juvenile record and parents).  He had blown off the L.A. Times article weeks ago..but having done so much extensive research on him over the past three years, it is hard for me, personally, to imagine that given Drudge’s obsession with being watched by public cameras and press alike, that he isn’t seriously angry if not a little disturbed.

So: my educated speculation is this:

Whether good or bad, his fame is hitting another peak. He already has what he wants (freedom and autonomy to do what he wants). What he desires more of is time and privacy. Perhaps even more flexibility. I imagine it would be easier to cut the radio show than make changes elsewhere. Logistical problems in his current home might factor in. He may want to keep an even lower profile. Also, he has talked several times on the show about leaving the country if Hillary or another Democrat is elected (including his most recent broadcast), imagining that he will be taxed heavily. (In fact, he said he moved to Florida to avoid paying state income tax).  If he is serious about that, I can see why he might not want to continue a long-term commitment to a radio syndicate.

So having been involved in this Drudge research project of mine for so long, I am surprised, but not shocked.

Nevertheless, I do hope I’m wrong. That will be a bummer. 

  by RegoPark - 9:37 pm        Comments (1) »


Sunday, August 26, 2007


Not Quite Catching Matt Drudge

While, as a rule, I don’t put stock into journalists’ quotes from anonymous “friends”, on the whole this week’s New York story on Matt Drudge is the most thoroughly researched of all I’ve read since following his press three years ago.  If Philip Weiss is still “Watching Matt Drudge”, there are a few insights I could still give him, but he’s grasped the gestalt. Well, kinda-sorta.  You DO get, after reading this treatise, why he might be elect to be elusive…right?

But hey: Can we work on NOT revealing the small island or hotel a guy lives? 

I won’t lie, folks — I came away with an ineffable, acute feeling of empathy for Matt. Not only because of the personal drama in his past, but the fact that it was unearthed.  Exactly what he doesn’t want, what he has the right to be protected from, has happened.  Probably not shocking, but regrettable.

  by RegoPark - 12:47 am        Comments (7) »


Sunday, August 19, 2007


Media-cracy in the U.K.

Not every Matt Drudge interview or appearance is worth writing home about, but it wouldn’t kill me or you to check him out at the MediaGuardian Edinburgh International TV Festival August 24-26.  Appearing live via video, he will share the floor with reps from Al-Jazeera, Sun Online, and ITV News on the subject of terror tapes and related ethical issues.  I don’t know what footage will be accessible, but lay odds that he’ll weigh in on his pet issue of London’s public camera surveillance and other liberties with civil liberties he loves to hate.  He has spent quite a bit of time in London, which currently leads the race on citizen surveillance in First World countries.

Matt’s always more interesting when he has to sing for his supper and isn’t just shooting the Shinola with those he already agrees with.  The key is to sneak a bee in his bonnet but not make him stop to pull the stinger out of his ass. 

  by RegoPark - 12:25 am        Comments (0) »


Sunday, August 12, 2007


The Way to REALLY Win, Part One: Why Kos, the L.A. Times, Halperin and Harris are all missing the point about Matt Drudge

This is just going to have to be one of those weeks where I throw up my hands and say that I don’t have time to write what I want. I don’t have time to organize my thoughts, to address each aspect of this topic point-by-point, or pull up my Drudge press library to double-check my sources. But here goes: I’m pretty confident that the notion Matt Drudge is the “most powerful man in America”, the “Walter Cronkite” of our era, or consciously forwarding a right-wing agenda outside of his own native bias…is officially out of hand.

Definitely his influence has been underestimated for awhile and the rumors of his career’s demise have been greatly exaggerated.  I’ve said this before: he’s somewhere between an 800 pound gorilla and a bull in a china shop. He can sustain damage whether deliberately or otherwise. But has it occurred to anyone that calling him powerful might be handing him power he didn’t already possess…on a silver platter, no less?

As a lefty liberal, and as a freelancer, I don’t have such a problem with bloggers forming a union.  I’ll stop short of consciously working with my colleagues to address the effects of conservative talk radio or the undue influence of Drudge or any other media presence.  Quality is what we need in citizen journalism, not quantity of voices. Not power in numbers. Not political one-upmanship, not sinking to the same journalistic level as our perceived opponents, not “military strategy” in an emerging industry. 

What’s happening this week, I fear, is that a large section of the blogger world is taking up arms against the wrong target.  In their rush to grab a tree branch and join the rest of Birnam Wood in the approach on Drudge Castle (oops, Dunsinane), they’re neglecting the real enemy…themselves.

In my opinion, this gorilla-cum-bull-cum-political albatross can do anything he wants to because his motivations are different from anything his detractors have taken the time to assess.  He has told the press for some time that his career as he knows it is finite (Radar 2003, Washington Post 2005, Washington Journal 2005). His interests are essentially more personal than political. That is part of his power: the freedom to do what he loves. There is nothing he values that he fears losing. He’s not Superman; he’s merely kryptonite-resistant.

If you take the time to mobilize at a bloggers’ convention to “fight the power”, form a website as the political opposite (”alternative”) to said power, pontificate on his looming downfall, perpetuate unsubstantiable rumors at him, and level silly personal insults at me in MY comment box… maybe it’s worth your while to take the time to study what motivates Matt Drudge. What REALLY motivates him.  Not what the media or political interest groups or your peers have told you motivates him. Don’t go for the jugular first…go for the gestalt. When he is having a rational, non-confrontational interview, what is he really telling them?  When you really listen without prejudice, what do you hear?

Unfortunately, most audiences hear what they want. Which is a pity, because with a bit of effort and restraint, you can learn from anyone, even people you violently disagree with. 

One could argue that it’s arrogant of any journalist (mainstream or citizen) to expect to influence the opinion of discerning adults who can read and decide for themselves.  At the risk of sounding facile, here’s my modest proposal:

If you, Joe Blogger, want to influence the swing voters of 2008, don’t concentrate your collective efforts on Drudge. It’s principle-centeredness, not enemy-centeredness, that will elevate your role in our culture.  Be the best citizen journalist you can be. Go where others don’t take the time to go. Be thoughtful in your choice of angles and sources. Be different in a positive way.  And if, like Drudge, you don’t have an editor or deadline, make the very best use of that freedom. Your travel on the high road will magnify Drudge’s own weaknesses. Let HIM be the buffoon…not you. Let others play the childish “end justifies the means” game. Don’t band together to consciously create a bogeyman on your own team.  Instead of a liberal Drudge, a liberal Limbaugh, or a liberal Coulter, the left needs personalities who earn the respect and admiration of publics on both sides of the political spectrum.  If that’s you, you know where to go from here.

RegoPark is a freelance writer with a background in marketing communications who has recently completed a media novel. She can be reached at http://regopark.wordpress.com.

  by RegoPark - 5:56 pm        Comments (0) »


Monday, July 30, 2007


QuikFAQ on a busy week…

Q. Why doesn’t Matt Drudge promote the radio show on a week he won’t be on?

A.  To be honest, I don’t have a definite answer, but let me weigh in with the facts I do know. I don’t think it’s a dis to his substitutes, who have included Joe Crummey and John Batchelor. (As I’ve alluded earlier, I’m not otherwise into conservative talk radio and don’t tune in when Drudge is away.)

First, Matt doesn’t promote his own show all that much. Years ago he said “I’m the worst marketer out there…I just don’t care. I throw my energy into the site.”  His existing promotional efforts consist only of throwing up links to station information in all 50 states, each Sunday.  If he isn’t available to broadcast from the radio control room in his home, he’s not disposed to updating the site.

Keep in mind WHY Drudge is usually out when he is.  He told C-SPAN’s Brian Lamb in 2005 that he “travels 30% of the time” and can use his WiFi only in the United States. To keep the website going, a vacation for him means putting in the usual amount of daily man-hours at his hotel computer.  Clearly, though, there are times when this isn’t possible or practical.  As I’ve said before, his sole assistant has put in roughly 26 hours a week…

Some could argue that it would be pretty annoying to be driven to a radio show expecting the regular host and get someone else.  Others would point out that the substitutes are getting paid for their services and it isn’t the regular host’s responsibility to promote them.  In any case, different radio personalities have their own preferences.  At any rate, it’s not as though Matt’s deliberately creating a news blackout when a pinch hitter’s at his plate…he just isn’t choosing to exert an extra, optional, effort.

More FAQs later…

  by RegoPark - 7:36 pm        Comments (0) »




Next Page »




0.393 seconds. Powered by WordPress

© 2006 Drudge Blog.com
Drudge Blog is not affiliated with Matt Drudge or the Drudge Report.

Contact: admin AT drudgeblog.com
Want to discuss Drudge? Visit DrudgeForum.com.